Posted on April 19, by sdonline The hegemonic power of capital sometime visible, sometimes invisible propagates an increasing gravitation to English as the common global language. The spread of English seems to be analogous to the spread of capitalism. Within the United States the country most responsible for the global expansion of capital, following in the footsteps of imperial Britain resides the largest population of native English-speakers of any country.
His theory defines culture in idealist terms, as something to strive for, and in this it helped to shape twentieth-century thinking about the value of the humanities in higher education.
Tylor, who proposed the descriptive theory of culture adopted by the emerging discipline of anthropology at about the same time. Download this page in PDF format Figure 1: Photograph of Matthew Arnold In Culture and Anarchy, Matthew Arnold articulated a theory of culture that continues to influence thinking about the value of the humanities in higher education.
He defined culture in idealist terms, as something to strive for, and in this respect his theory differs from its anthropological counterpart. This second usage was also a Victorian invention, spelled out around the same time in Edward B.
Each redefines culture from a term limited to individuals to one that encompasses society as a whole. In doing so, each has difficulty actually defining culture, while being considerably better at explaining what is not culture.
The two are thus more alike than not, representing different approaches to the same problem, rather than two unrelated uses of the terms culture see Stocking. It did not start out that way.
Culture and Anarchy was original in contesting precisely this elitist view of culture as connoisseurship, or an appreciation of the fine arts. This was the current sense of the word when Arnold began writing.
The word culture originated in the world of farming, as a term for tending crops or animals, which is where we get the word agriculture Williams From this, it developed a metaphorical meaning in the eighteenth century for culturing the mind, rather than crops.
And in this latter sense it became associated by the early nineteenth century with a knowledge of Greek, Latin, and the fine arts. Instead, he argues, culture is a combination of broad intellectual interests with the goal of social improvement.
Rather than a means to differentiate the elite from the mass, Arnoldian culture assumes the elite and the mass have a shared humanity. He was the son of a famous educator, Thomas Arnoldwho insisted that, whatever goals one pursued in life, they had to be socially useful.
As a dedicated poet in his early adulthood, Arnold grappled with the problem of reconciling his love of fine art with the need for social utility, a topic that formed the mainstay of his written correspondence with his closest friend, the poet Arthur Hugh Clough In this regard, Arnold was representative of an era in which many artists questioned the relevance of art to society, even as Victorian Britain underwent a radical social transformation, leaving behind its agricultural past in the wake of the new industrial economy.
In the middle decades of the century, Britain was particularly turbulent, famously unsettled by the inhumanity of early industrialism and the demands of a vocal working-class for political representation.
In one of the most well known incidents, on 23 Julya large crowd gathered at Hyde Park in London to hear speakers on voting rights. They were confronted by police when the government declared the meeting an illegal assembly. Soldiers were called out whenpeople entered the park anyway, knocking down fences meant to keep them out.
While staunchly opposing violence, he nevertheless understood the need for social change. The injection of social change into his new theory was the formula he sought to combine his own love of fine art with social utility.
His ideas were predicated as a solution to the problem represented by the Hyde Park Incident, which he believed demonstrated the need for greater social unity to counter the danger of a divided society.
He described Britain as suffering from the conflicting interests of three different classes of people, and he gave each a new name meant to describe its predominant trait. To Arnold, its discontent represented the greatest threat of all to British social stability, and he used the Hyde Park incident to illustrate this.
But the central problem was that all three groups viewed the world differently because the perception of each was limited to its own self interest. Barbarians want higher prices for the grain that grows on their land to increase their wealth.Each Printable Activity or Vocabulary Game below was created using My Word Search’s easy-to-use word search monstermanfilm.com sister site has crossword puzzles.
Matthew Arnold, Culture and Anarchy Though often presented as a paen to apolitical cultural values, Culture and Anarchy was motivated in part by Arnold's distaste for working-class agitation for the vote. 40 (Volume 20, No.
1) March, Introduction by The Editors. SOCIALISM AND DEMOCRACY AT Frank Rosengarten – Looking Back in Order to Look Ahead: Twenty Years of Research and Publishing by the Research Group on Socialism and Democracy Victor Wallis – Socialism and Democracy During the First 20 Years of Socialism and Democracy.
Archives and past articles from the Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News, and monstermanfilm.com We have moved! Sociological Research Online (SRO) is now published by the BSA and SAGE, and as of August this site will no longer be active. The journal homepage, latest updates, and all issues (including issue onwards) are available on the SAGE Journals monstermanfilm.com you are based outside of an academic institution, please contact .
You make a very good point about the two Kinzer pieces re Syria. I too was a little surprised to find such truth telling about Syria in American MSM after all the propaganda we were being constantly bombarded with.